Sunday, February 3, 2013

Scrapping off bail not a solution to eradicate corruption


Scrapping off Bail not a solution to the fight against Corruption
By Adellah Agaba

During the 27th NRM Liberation anniversary celebrations at Nyakasanga play ground in Kasese, His Excellency renewed his call for scrapping off bail for officials suspected in capital offences stating that it hampers the fight against corruption. He stated that the Judiciary is making his work difficult by giving bail to every suspect.

As much as we agree with you Mr. President on making the corrupt lose appetite of stealing government public funds meant for service delivery, scrapping or denying bail to the suspects will not reduce corruption levels unless it’s complimented by other factors.
The right to Bail is based on the presumption of innocence until proven guilty by a competent Court of Law.  S. 77 of the Magistrates Courts Act states that on an application for bail, Court considers some factors to determine whether or not to grant bail. These include nature and gravity of offence, severity of punishment, accused person’s antecedents ( as far as are known) whether s/he has a fixed place of stay; possibility of interfering with prosecution witnesses, advanced age of the accused, whether s/he is  sole bread winner of the family, his/her role in the community. The entitlement to apply for bail is a fundamental right and freedom which is protected by the Constitution, denial of which amounts to robbing the suspects’ fundamental rights. Bail can only be scrapped or reviewed by an Act of Parliament and the judiciary will have no choice but to follow suit.
The Presidents pronouncement came after most of the suspects in the theft of billions of money meant for service delivery were granted bail by the courts of law. Recent corruption scandals opened citizens’ eyes to the growing levels of corruption in Uganda as billions of shillings were stolen and misappropriated by the public officials. The Pensions scandal in the Ministry of Public Service with the loss of 100 billion shillings meant for retired public servants, the rot in Prime Minister’s Office and matters are not helped by the fact that Uganda’s 2012 Corruption Perceptions Index (CPI) ranking by Transparency International revealed Uganda’s position at 130 out of 176 countries with a score of 29.

However, scrapping and denial of bail alone will not reduce the high levels of corruption that has made service delivery in hospitals, schools, roads hard to achieve. Government efforts towards elimination of corruption must include a policy to improve salaries of government workers. The Police and teaching remain the least paid and most ridiculed profession, living in squalid conditions in an attempt to make ends meet. The judiciary has to be well remunerated in order to dispense off their work with transparency and to avoid bribes at all levels.

Selective prosecution must be condemned because you cannot simply pick one person and leave others. Relying on selective prosecution to eliminate corruption and to act as a warning for other people in influential positions is a myth.  

The fight against corruption is not a preserve of government institutions. Fighting corruption involves a concerted effort from all stakeholders. There is need for a quick passing of the Anti-corruption amendment Bill so that officials implicated in these corruption scandals are effectively brought to book, and all their assets acquired from the stolen money are confiscated and liquidated to replace the misappropriated funds in respective offices. This way, tax payers’ hard earned money is not used to pay off other peoples’ fraudulent losses but instead be used in ensuring proper service delivery in the country.

The writer works with Uganda Debt Network
aagaba@udn.or.ug







Government shd disclose the Source of refunded money to donors.


Government should disclose the source of refunded money to donors
By: Adellah Agaba

The year 2012 was one that opened citizens’ eyes to the growing levels of corruption in Uganda as many corruption scandals in billions of shillings were unearthed. The Pensions scandal in the Ministry of Public Service with the loss of 100 billion shillings meant for retired public servants was discovered and up to now more details on the rot are emerging.

As if that was not enough, the Office of the Prime Minister (OPM) one of the most respected offices in monitoring implementation of government programmes astounded Ugandans when big chunks of money went missing and could not be accounted for by the accounting officers. This  arose out of the Auditor General’s report released in October last year with a special audit report indicating that up to Shs50 billion was misappropriated by staff in the Prime Minister’s office. The misappropriated funds were intended for post-war recovery in Northern Uganda under the Peace, Recovery and Development Plan (PRDP). Matters are not helped by the fact that Uganda’s 2012 Corruption Perceptions Index (CPI) ranking by Transparency International revealed Uganda’s position at 130 out of 176 countries with a score of 29.
Not surprisingly the corruption scandals raised eyebrows in the donor world including Norway, Ireland, Denmark and United Kingdom, among others, which led to donor suspension of aid to Uganda. This was a big blow to a country that has a large part of its national budget funded by donors. Mixed reactions from the public could not go un noticed as everyone was concerned as to what was going to happen to the different programmes in health, peace and restoration, education, mention them that run on donor money.
Alas, there came good news! Depending on how you look at it. The Ugandan government refunded 4Miliion Euros (14bn) donor aid money stolen by some government officials to the Irish government to restore the broken relationship. Unfortunately, reports indicate that Ireland has announced that the suspension of its bilateral aid to Uganda will remain in place until officials are confident that controls have been put in place to prevent misappropriation of aid money from their country.
 
Something the Government of Uganda did to restore confidence in the donors and the public instead raised so many questions that have not been answered up to now. Where did the government get all this kind of money to refund the Irish government? Which budget line did they use? Which sectors have been affected by this refund? But the biggest of them all is that, if the government can afford to refund all this money, do we after all need donor money? It was indicated that the money was got from government’s consolidated account. Isn’t that tax payers’ money meant for improved service delivery? 

As activists we demand that in the interest of transparency and accountability the government should clearly disclose the source of the money refunded to the Irish government when teachers are still earning low salaries, health facilities still in bad shape, roads full of pot holes, and the education sector still lacking school facilities and structures in most districts, which are all summed up as regressive service delivery.

We also call for quick passing of the Anti-corruption amendment Bill so that officials implicated in these corruption scandals are effectively brought to book, and all their assets acquired from the stolen money are confiscated and liquidated to replace the misappropriated funds in respective offices. This way, tax payers’ hard earned money is not used to pay off other peoples’ fraudulent losses but instead be used in ensuring proper service delivery in the country.

The Writer works with Uganda Debt Network
aagaba@udn.or.ug